Thought Piece

California’s new solar mandate will cost much more than anyone was told, writes Steven Sexton.

Essentially, the public sector, including well-funded politically active environmental groups, have decided that renewable energy, electric cars, and large scale storage batteries are the best investments for the future of California energy, economic development and environmentalism.

Unfortunately, this Wall Street Journal’s Op-Ed revealed the flawed accounting methodology for California’s state expenditure of solar energy and its return on investment will likely weaken the credibility for other CA initiatives.

First, it seems the public sector is awash in funding for renewables dedicated to the California’s environment and emission reductions. Consequently, the damage to these solar efforts casts a long shadow over the entire clean energy industry.

At a minimum, there should be full disclosure of all public funding and results, with independent verification. This is especially important when these funds and grants are received and expended on behalf of California.

In a world flooded with dubious environmental and economic claims, the credibility of all reported facts is crucial to state government, CA voters, and of course investors.

No matter what.

The Phony Numbers Behind California’s Solar Mandate

A state-hired consultant lowballed the costs and assumed massive subsidies in estimating benefits.

California’s energy regulators effectively cooked the books to justify their recent command that all homes built in the Golden State after 2020 be equipped with solar panels. Far from a boon to homeowners, the costs to builders and home buyers will likely far exceed the benefits to the state.

The California Energy Commission, which approved the rule as part of new energy-efficiency regulations, didn’t conduct an objective, independent investigation of the policy’s effects. Instead it relied on economic analysis from the consultancy that proposed the policy, Energy and Environmental Economics Inc. Its study concluded that home buyers get a 100% investment return—paying $40 more in monthly mortgage costs but saving $80 a month on electricity. If it’s such a good deal, why aren’t home buyers clamoring for more panels already? Most new homes aren’t built with solar panels today, even though the state is saturated by solar marketing.

The Energy Commission is too optimistic about the cost of panels. It assumes the cost was $2.93 a watt in 2016 and will decline 17% by 2020. Yet comprehensive analysis of panel costs by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimated the average cost of installed panels to be $4.50 a watt for the 2- to 4-kilowatt systems the policy mandates. That is $4,000 more than regulators claim for a 2.6-kilowatt model system in the central part of the state, where 20% of new homes are expected to be built. Berkeley Lab further estimates that costs fell a mere 1% between 2015 and 2016, far short of the 4% average annual decline the regulators predict.

Now consider the alleged savings on energy bills. The commission’s analysis assumes California will maintain its net energy-metering policy, which effectively subsidizes electricity produced by a rooftop solar panel. Residential solar generators are paid as much as eight times what wholesale generators receive, according to a grid operator’s analysis of publicly available data. Dozens of states are rethinking these generous subsidies, paid by ratepayers, because they shift the costs of maintaining the electric grid to relatively poor nonsolar households. The California Public Utilities Commission is set to revisit this regressive policy in 2019—before the solar mandate takes effect.

If the subsidies are removed, solar adopters would be in the red. This is why the electricity generated by the solar mandate should be valued at the cost of its replacement from the grid—not at the subsidized rate households receive. In a presentation at the National Bureau of Economic Research earlier this year, I estimated the value of rooftop generation for each of California’s ZIP Codes using one year of price data from the grid operator. The average electricity value of the solar mandate’s model system is $12.50 a month, far less than the $80 benefit the regulators claim.

Moreover, using statistics to estimate which power plants would respond to additional solar generation, my colleagues and I also estimated the total value of the pollution avoided by the mandate’s model system to be only $6 a month. Even accepting the Energy Commission’s optimism about solar panel costs, the policy’s public benefits are only half as large.

Were state regulators interested in science-based policy to increase solar generation, they would acknowledge that economies of scale allow large-scale solar farms to generate twice the electricity of the solar mandate at the same cost. Inefficient but subsidized rooftop solar limits the market for utility-scale solar by depressing the wholesale electricity prices big generators receive. Even community arrays atop schools and parking lots would be less costly than the commission’s mandate.

Regulators should tailor policy to reflect routine variation in the value of solar generation across the state’s congested electricity grid. Solar panels are most effective when installed where transmission constraints make supply relatively scarce—not on every roof in California.

Though the solar mandate is unlikely to deliver huge savings to consumers, it certainly will raise the price of new and old homes. This couldn’t come at a worse time: Rising housing costs are putting the dream of homeownership further out of reach of low- and middle-income Californians. Sacramento politicians accuse the Trump administration of ignoring science and forgoing expert, independent review in pursuing its environmental and energy agenda. They should look in the mirror.

Mr. Sexton is an assistant professor of public policy and economics at Duke University.

By |2018-08-30T20:34:29+00:00August 13th, 2018|Categories: Energy, Thought Piece|17 Comments

17 Comments

  1. minecraft October 4, 2018 at 3:54 am - Reply

    It’s an remarkable paragraph for all the web viewers;
    they will take benefit from it I am sure.

  2. minecraft October 4, 2018 at 10:24 am - Reply

    Hey I am so grateful I found your blog, I really found you by accident, while I
    was searching on Google for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say thank
    you for a remarkable post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read through it all at
    the minute but I have saved it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will
    be back to read more, Please do keep up the excellent work.

  3. minecraft October 4, 2018 at 9:36 pm - Reply

    This article offers clear idea designed for the new visitors of blogging, that genuinely how to
    do blogging and site-building.

  4. minecraft October 5, 2018 at 6:18 pm - Reply

    Appreciating the commitment you put into your site and detailed information you offer.
    It’s awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same out of date
    rehashed information. Great read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m
    including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  5. minecraft October 6, 2018 at 8:25 am - Reply

    Your way of telling all in this piece of writing is
    actually good, all be able to effortlessly understand it, Thanks a lot.

  6. minecraft October 7, 2018 at 12:48 pm - Reply

    Great post. I used to be checking continuously this blog and I
    am impressed! Very helpful information specially the closing part :
    ) I maintain such info much. I used to be looking
    for this certain info for a very long time.

    Thanks and best of luck.

  7. minecraft October 7, 2018 at 9:32 pm - Reply

    It’s an amazing article for all the online viewers;
    they will get advantage from it I am sure.

  8. minecraft free download 2018 October 8, 2018 at 8:18 am - Reply

    I have been browsing online greater than three
    hours lately, yet I by no means found any interesting
    article like yours. It is lovely worth sufficient for me.
    Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made just right content as you probably did,
    the internet will probably be much more helpful than ever before.

  9. minecraft free download 2018 October 8, 2018 at 9:09 am - Reply

    Quality articles is the main to attract the users to pay a
    quick visit the website, that’s what this website is providing.

  10. minecraft free download 2018 October 8, 2018 at 10:24 pm - Reply

    Hi there, I discovered your web site by way of Google while
    looking for a similar topic, your site got here up, it seems to be good.

    I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, simply turned into aware of your weblog via Google, and found that it’s truly informative.
    I am going to be careful for brussels. I’ll be grateful should
    you proceed this in future. Many folks will be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

  11. minecraft secret free download October 18, 2018 at 2:00 pm - Reply

    I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website.

    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and
    visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to create your theme?
    Fantastic work!

  12. Health Benefits of Coconut Oil October 23, 2018 at 12:33 am - Reply

    Superb post however I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic?
    I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further.
    Cheers!

  13. Coconut Oil Benefits October 27, 2018 at 4:17 pm - Reply

    Hey! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after reading through some of the
    post I realized it’s new to me. Anyways, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be
    book-marking and checking back often!

  14. Coconut Oil Benefits October 27, 2018 at 7:31 pm - Reply

    Excellent write-up. I definitely appreciate this site.
    Keep writing!

  15. descargar facebook November 2, 2018 at 10:06 am - Reply

    Everything is very open with a really clear description of the challenges.
    It was definitely informative. Your website is very useful.

    Thanks for sharing!

  16. What Equipment is Needed for Sling TV November 12, 2018 at 9:16 am - Reply

    Thanks on your marvelous posting! I truly enjoyed reading it, you will be a great author.

    I will make sure to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back someday.

    I want to encourage you to ultimately continue your great work, have
    a nice day!

Leave A Comment

WordPress spam blocked by CleanTalk.